ISOC-NY's July monthly meeting will take place tonight, 17 July 2008, at NYU.
Date: Thursday, 17 Jul 2008 Time: 7:00 pm–9:00 pm Location: Room 317, 251 Mercer Street NYC (SW corner of West 4th)
Note: Use the entrance on the west side since construction blocks the Mercer Street entrance. Must bring photo ID.
Agenda
Meet new members. We expect and welcome new faces!
By-laws reform. Needed but a drudge! How can we set about it?
Planning future meetings and events. Good news is we have just received a sizable grant from ISOC-NY for our Fall program.
ISXubuntu Linux project progress report. News from our trusty coders.
Access advocacy program. Just an idea at present—the city needs some kind of central resource for those with connection difficulties.
ICANN. Tom Lowenhaupt will report on his experiences at the ICANN Paris meet in June.
Web standards. How can we make our own & OneWebDay sites W3C compliant?
Jeffrey Barke is senior developer and information architect at theMechanism, a multimedia firm with offices in New York, London and Durban, South Africa.
I used to live near Pratt Institute, on Vanderbilt Avenue in Brooklyn. One of the many great graphic artists and designers that attended Pratt was Paul Rand (back in 1929). For those of you that don’t know the name (shame on you), Paul Rand (August 15, 1914 – November 26, 1996) was an American graphic designer, best known for his corporate logo designs, helping to originate the Swiss Style of graphic design, and keen thinking and curmudgeonly attitude about our profession.
I stumbled on a 1991 interview with Rand conducted by Miggs B, producer/host of “Miggs B On TV,” a public access TV show in Fairfield County, Connecticut.
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3 of the interview features an idiot known as “Art Mann,” – a bit of a ghoul – and obviously a bi-product of early 90’s baboonery. Rand doesn’t fully grasp the intended humor of a segment where Art claims that Westinghouse came to him to simplify their logo (one of Rand’s logo designs), which added uncomfortability to the hearty porridge of nonsense that was being served up to Rand in heaping spoonfuls.
Part 3
However out of date the interview segment is, it is full of great nuggets from one of the “design greats.” One of Rand’s quotes that particularly impressed me was, “A good logo is meaningless until it is used.” Good food for thought, indeed.
Dave Fletcher is a Founder and Creative Director at theMechanism, a multi-disciplinary design agency with offices in New York, London and Durban, South Africa.
ISOC-NY's next monthly meeting will be held at tomorrow, 19 June 2008, at NYU.
Date: Thursday, 19 Jun 2008 Time: 7:30 pm–9:30 pm Location: Room 317, 251 Mercer Street NYC (SW corner of West 4th)
Note: Use the entrance on the west side since construction blocks the Mercer Street entrance. Must bring photo ID.
Jeffrey Barke is senior developer and information architect at theMechanism, a multimedia firm with offices in New York, London and Durban, South Africa.
In the grand Shakespearean Play of your business, the most overlooked yet most important asset of your company is your brand. You can spend copious amounts of money on infrastructure, desks, equipment, great employees, and all the copies of Microsoft Office you can shake Bill Gates’ quarters at, but without your almighty brand – your essence and first impression – you’re dead at the starting line…guaranteed. Think about how many times you get to make a first impression with a potential client? One if you’re lucky. And that time is money.
Your “Brand” encompasses many things, but most importantly involves a logo, a mantra or methodology, a color palette and a typographic palette. Your brand also relates to how you communicate with your audience, your fellow employees and how you want your employees to communicate with the outside world. It represents – and is representative of – every part of the corporate ecosystem, living together in a positive and rewarding symbiotic relationship.
Despite all of that talk about one chance to make an impression, realize there are plenty of potential clients that haven’t yet had the pleasure of connecting to your brand, so it’s not too late. Face it, after a few years of scraping to the middle of an industry, a little botox, and maybe a nip and a tuck on that brand couldn’t hurt. If you think I jest, go ahead and ask Ms. Hilton, the living embodiment of “human as brand…”
Before you jump right into the branding experience that very few business managers and owners dream of, please consider the following:
Do you have a budget in place to get your brand where it needs to be? A branding initiative is going to cost money. If an agency or freelancer gives you a cheap deal, think twice about whom you’re hiring for this important job. When you pay peanuts you don’t just get monkeys, you get the laziest, carefree, knumbskull baboons in the entire forest. Would you hire a discount dentist? How about the doctor who is going to perform open-heart surgery on you? Or the guy that is fixing the breaks on your family wagon? So, why would you entrust your important brand, which in many ways is responsible for maintaining the affection of your employees, clients, and your salary in the hands of a hack? And, if you’re going to re-brand, please don’t just slap a new logo on your website and keep using your old stationery until it runs out. Not only is it silly, but it will not justify the amount of work that should go into a new branding initiative.
Have you formulated a mission statement, or mantra for your business? In other words, have you really considered why your business works and why it doesn’t work? Any creative firm you hire to assist in the re-branding process should be asking your team questions about this stuff. If they are not, please show them the door before you pay them their huge fee and proceed to hate the rest of us “designer types” forever.
Why are you re-branding? If you’re re-branding because the business is failing, more than likely, you need somebody to come in and figure out much more important things about your overall business model. A new logo can’t help you now. If you are re-branding because your pal “Hank” just got a neat new logo from his son’s nephew’s girlfriend, chances are a new logo isn’t what you need.
A branding company should be concerned with how your new identity will interact with a website, your collateral, your stationery, your presentational materials, and even more importantly, by exploring the way your employees describe your company to the outside world.
Okay, you’ve gathered some of your hard-earned cash together and hired a stellar graphic design firm to sit down and extract from you and your team the very essence of your nubile brand. What should you expect from these raptors masked behind their fancy shirts and goatees? First of all, you should expect (and demand) patience. In many cases, the experience you’re about to go through is a lot like describing an average child to a group of strangers with smart-assed honor students. Nobody enjoys answering questions about their competitors and what they think is successful and unsuccessful about their current brand. However, it is a painful, and very necessary conversation to have.
Below are some of the questions you might be asked by the creative team you’ve hired to assist with your re-branding process:
Name 3 of your competitors and what makes them successful?
Describe what makes your organization successful?
What aspect of your business would you change if you could?
If you met a new customer today how would you describe your brand to them?
If you met a friend on the street today how would you describe your brand to them?
How do your employees value your brand?
…See, there’s a reason you’ve gathered this team of Treo-toting, pencil chomping Macintosh advocates, right?
Good designers are great problem solvers. They are the good folks you tap on the shoulder on the commute home when you need a word for “effectively solve” that begins with “right now.” They are not scary brainiacs, they are just immersed in all the things that you don’t necessarily have the time for: typefaces, color palettes, layout styles and innovative solutions are what they live and breathe for. Don’t despise them – pity them – because in the end, while you can go home and zone out in front of the TV watching the latest episode of ER, they are busy stressing over the font, motion graphics or color choice from the commercial that you skipped because you were too busy enjoying that conversation with your little son or daughter. Trust me, they’re not lonely people, they are just obsessive, and the good ones are obsessed with solving the problems that clients like you bring to them daily. You want this type of person on your team as much as they need you to pay your bills. It’s a symbiotic relationship.
Generally, a re-branding experience is not for the faint of heart – yet most of the time, if you go into the situation with an open mind, you’ll find yourself working very well with the design team you’ve chosen. Warning: If the leader of this team of creative gorillas (they’ll refer to him as “Creative Director”, ”Poobah”, or something even more unnerving like “Chief” and they’re either wearing sunglasses or have the longest, and most well-groomed goatee of the team) pulls out their iPod and asks you to speak slowly into the microphone, reach for the nearest weapon and start swinging for the bleachers – technological devices and snarky rhetoric don’t make for a good design firm. However, if they are a chatty, concerned and positive bunch, keep an open mind and please allow them to continue. Likely, you’ll be surprised at what you will learn about your company throughout the process.
Microsoft Corporation has made an offer to Yahoo, inc. for $44.6 “Bazillion” dollars (…it might as well be). This confirms that Microsoft has begun the floundering process by which they are snatching what they can in a bitter realization that Apple has won the computer operating software battle for now, and perhaps the entire war. The fact that Microsoft’s stock continued to drop after the announcement, shows how much faith their stakeholders have in the decision as well.
While the obvious signs of Microsoft’s future demise is evident in their slow, torturous, pre-recession slide into stock hell, I first really, and truly believed that Microsoft lost the PC war right after the holidays, when two hard-core IT professionals remarked on the beauty of the shiny new iMac in our New York Bunker. They also gleefully chortled that they now “love Macs” and proudly own them at home. As soon as the foot soldiers of Microsoft: the IT dudes, begin to jump ship, something is wrong in La La Land. With all that said, this slow, calculated downfall will not be without a fight. Expect hordes of viruses invading our precious Macs like ants to a picnic basket full of honey covered iPhones. Remember, for every IT person who adores their new Mac, there will likely be several others who will do their best to destroy Apple machines with tawdry new viral treats. What else are they supposed to do when Microsoft viruses are no longer pressworthy?
Which brings me back to the impending Microsoft/Yahoo connection. It’s like asking a bear to french-kiss a beagle. Yahoo has recently begun to reach the nerds they’ve craved since Google started giving them noogies on the playground with the unveiling of pipes, a cool mashup tool. On the other side of the playground, Microsoft realized that the only thing that they still had a stronghold on was their precious Microsoft Office software, so ensconced in the collective of business as we know it, it would take generations for them to screw it up. However, from around the back door of the playground, came Google with the novel idea of putting an easily shared version of Microsoft’s Office tools online. When Google released a docs, the mighty Apple thieves saw the tables turned on them and began to wet their neatly pressed slacks.
After the Zune disaster, and new realization that the children of IBM have been drinking Apple-flavored kool-aid for the past couple generations with increasingly improved results, Microsoft is possibly modifying their strategy and slowly exiting the operating system and software market. Changing the downward spiral of two “once great companies” will not be easy, but since the mightiest of all opulent nerds, Bill Gates, has taken up Guitar Hero for his retirement, and is saving the world with U2, all bets are off that Microsoft will be able to continue to bully the playground dorks anymore. Ultimately, misery loves company, and ol’ Microsoft and Yahoo, inc. might make magic yet. But I’m investing in McDonalds, because when the going gets tough, the tough buy $1 burgers…
Maybe Google will be the next to freak out and make a bid on Apple. Then the recession will be in full swing…
Dave Fletcher is a Founder and Creative Director of theMechanism, a maxi-media firm in New York City and London. He’d be crazy to say that he believes that Microsoft is in as much trouble as he claims they are in this article. He just wants Google to buy Apple so he can make more money on his two whole shares of stock…
Microsoft Corporation has 
